NVIDIA xStock

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken product page states that fees are charged as described in each xStock's base prospectus, but it does not identify a specific prospectus, provide its date, or give an original-sour | anthropic: confirmed — The archived Kraken NVDAx page contains the claimed quote verbatim in the redemption FAQ: "kaikista xStockeihin tehtävistä sijoituksista peritään maksu kunkin xStockin perusesitteessä esitetyllä taval

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The Terms of Service supports that the linked Privacy Notice governs collection, processing, and transfer of personal data, and it states the claimed URL. However, the claim does not provide | anthropic: confirmed — The archived xStocks Terms of Service verbatim contains the quoted sentence: 'Our Privacy Notice, available at https://xstocks.com/documents/xstocks-privacy-policy.pdf ("Privacy Notice") governs our c

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: confirmed — The archived app.rwa.xyz/assets/NVDAx page explicitly lists under the 'Terms' field: 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)', directly matching the claimed quote and confirming this is the governing | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Kraken page supports that the xStocks Opt-In Rewards announcement is dated April 2, 2026, and contains the quoted 1:1-backing statement. However, a product announcement is not one | anthropic: confirmed — The archived page at the cited URL displays the byline date "April 2, 2026" for the article titled "Introducing xStocks Opt-In Rewards," confirming Kraken published this announcement on that date. Bot

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited legal terms explicitly state that tokenized equities are not offered by Backed Finance or its affiliates directly to the public, but the claim does not answer the slot question, wh | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The quote is verbatim-accurate — Section 7.1 of the terms states "Tokenized equities are NOT offered by us or by any affiliated entity of ours directly to the public" — so the claim is factu

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Backed article confirms that a legal-documentation library exists and directs readers there for legal documents and prohibited/restricted-country lists, but it does not identify on | anthropic: confirmed — The archived press release contains the exact claimed quote verbatim: "For a full list of prohibited and restricted countries and review of legal documentation, please visit, https://www.assets.backed

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources support high-level individual account eligibility, identity verification, and possible jurisdiction-specific requirements, but they do not answer the requested KYC/KYB thresholds | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The SLOT QUESTION asks for KYC/KYB requirements, specific thresholds, and turnaround time to get whitelisted. While the fetched sources do support the claim's generic onboarding narrative (t

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — The RWA.xyz aggregator labels the primary market “Professional Investor,” but no qualifying legal, regulatory, or issuer document establishes that direct mint/redeem access is limited accordingly. Kra | anthropic: confirmed — The claim splits into two testable parts, both of which the fetched content directly supports and both of which speak to the slot question (investor class for direct mint/redeem vs. secondary holding, | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited material does not establish a complete eligible-investor rule for direct mint/redemption versus secondary holding. RWA.xyz, an aggregator, labels primary-market eligibility as “Pro

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 130c7c88-84bf-496b-bc1e-8ff18545fb41: The incumbent directly addresses registration status and regulatory approval, naming HSBC, SEC and state securities commissions, Rule 433, Registration No. 333-277211, and June 18, 2026, with precise SEC-filed evidence. The new claim addresses geographic restrictions and absent protections but is comparatively vague about jurisdictions, restricted investors, specific regulatory actions, and holder impact.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 5d6612ac-f08e-4cc8-8332-cf5ded0f456c: The incumbent directly ties NVDAx’s value exposure to NVIDIA stock and identifies a specific issuer-disclosed business risk: additional export controls on NVIDIA’s H20 products during fiscal 2026. The new claim establishes only generic stock-tracking and total-loss risk, without citing a specific deterioration in NVIDIA’s business or yield source.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: contradicted — The wallet-withdrawal method is supported: Kraken states that NVDAx can be withdrawn to any compatible blockchain wallet. However, the same NVDAx page expressly discloses a separate path to redeem xSt | anthropic: confirmed — The claim asserts (1) Kraken holders can withdraw NVDAx to compatible blockchain wallets, and (2) that this withdrawal is not disclosed as direct share redemption. Both cited quotes are verbatim-accur

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources identify Backed Assets as issuer, Jersey as domicile and dispute-resolution country, and “Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)” as the applicable terms. They do not identify t | anthropic: confirmed — The rwa.xyz asset page for NVDAx explicitly states the value as claimed: under 'Terms' it reads 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)', the Issuer is 'Backed Assets', and 'Domicile' is 'Jersey, Cha

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The aggregator states a 0.50% redemption fee with a USD 100 minimum, but it does not state that the issuer charges the fee. It also is not a qualifying legal-terms or issuer-docs source. | anthropic: confirmed — The archived RWA.xyz page for NVDAx states verbatim under the Primary Market section: 'Redemption fee is 0.50% of market price with a minimum of USD 100,' with Redemption Fees listed as 0.50%. This ma

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The aggregator states a 0.50% subscription fee based on market price, with a USD 100 minimum, but it does not state that the issuer charges the fee. It is also not a qualifying legal-terms o | anthropic: confirmed — The archived source's Subscription Description states verbatim: "Subscription fee is 0.50% of market price with a minimum of USD 100." matching the claimed rate (0.50% of market price) and the USD 100

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source confirms that Pausable Config is enabled and can pause transfers, mints, and burns, but it does not disclose incident-response procedures, the responsible authority, activation cr | anthropic: confirmed — The archived explorer page for NVIDIA xStock (Xsc9...qEh) lists pausableConfig among the token-2022 extensions and, under '### Pausable Config / Enabled', states verbatim: 'Allows the token program to

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The explorer confirms that pausable-config and permanent-delegate extensions are enabled and describes their powers, but it does not identify the pause authority or permanent-delegate addres | anthropic: confirmed — Both material claims are supported by the archived Solana Explorer page for NVIDIA xStock (NVDAx). The Pausable Config extension is Enabled with the description that it 'Allows the token program to pa

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 83e91502-7ffb-43b7-8781-c73d5076604d: The incumbent directly answers every part of the slot: Solana is the canonical chain, it gives the exact mint, and it explicitly classifies the instance as a native Token-2022 issue rather than bridged. Its own evidence supports the native designation, mint address, token standard, and NVIDIA xStock identity. The new claim gives the mint and Token-2022 issuance but does not itself clearly state the canonical-chain or native-versus-bridged conclusion.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — The RWA.xyz aggregator states that NVDAx is native on all eight listed networks, but aggregator evidence is not an accepted evidence class for this slot. The supplied record contains neither issuer do | anthropic: confirmed — The rwa.xyz NVDAx page lists exactly eight networks in its Tokens table, each marked 'Native': Solana (token-2022), Ethereum, Arbitrum, Ink, HyperEVM, Optimism, BNB Chain, and Mantle (all ERC-20). Thi

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source names Grant Thornton (Cayman) as auditor, but it provides neither the audit scope nor an audit date. Therefore, it does not answer the slot question requiring scope + date for eac | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The slot question requires one fact per audit giving scope + date (fund audits AND smart-contract audits). The archived source confirms only 'Auditor: Grant Thornton (Cayman)' — the firm nam

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The RWA.xyz page identifies Alpaca Securities LLC as custodian, Grant Thornton (Cayman) as auditor, and Maerki Baumann & Co. AG as paying agent, although it is an aggregator rather than a qu | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The slot asks for named custodians, administrators, auditors, and banks serving the NVDAx product. Three of the four entities are directly confirmed by RWA.xyz as service providers to NVDAx:

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=3) | gpt: contradicted — The sources support the evolution of bTokens into xStocks with the same underlying exposure, NVDAx’s June 20, 2025 inception date, and weekly opt-in rewards. However, the claim that the corpus provide | anthropic: contradicted — The bTokens-to-xStocks evolution and same underlying exposure are supported by the Backed article ('xStocks are the next evolution of bTokens — same underlying exposure...'), and NVDAx's 06/20/2025 in | kimi: contradicted — Two of three sub-claims hold: the backed.fi page contains 'xStocks are the next evolution of bTokens — same underlying exposure' (in the archived page content) and rwa.xyz lists NVDAx Inception Date 0

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited aggregator states an “Inception Date” of 06/20/2025, but it does not establish that this was the token/product launch date. No qualifying issuer document or launch announcement is | anthropic: confirmed — The archived rwa.xyz page for NVIDIA xStock (NVDAx) lists 'Inception Date 06/20/2025', which directly corresponds to the product's launch date. This matches the claimed launch_date of 2025-06-20 (06/2

Verifier note: registry: superseded

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — The cited aggregator labels the issuer as “Backed Assets,” but no registry, legal-terms, or regulator evidence is provided to establish that this is the issuer’s complete legal entity name rather than | anthropic: confirmed — The cited source (app.rwa.xyz/assets/NVDAx) explicitly lists under Legal & Regulatory: 'Issuer / Backed Assets / Issuer LEI / 984500001AB7C6C7F577'. The claimed issuer_entity value 'Backed Assets' mat

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source supports that each NVDAx token is backed 1:1 by an NVIDIA Corporation common share and describes NVDAx as fully collateralized by traditional shares held by a regulated third-part | anthropic: confirmed — The source directly states the value: 'Jokainen digitaalinen NVDAx -token on sidottu suhteessa 1:1 oikeisiin NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock -osakkeisiin, jotka ovat ulkopuolisen säilytyspalvelun hall

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 4cb29b25-b096-4bc9-a811-9404af9ade57: The incumbent directly addresses all requested dimensions: full concentration in NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock and the absence of disclosed duration, maturity, or credit rating. The new claim supports concentration and regulated custody but does not address duration, maturity, or credit quality.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source identifies NVIDIA Corporation common stock as the backing asset and states a 1:1 token-to-share relationship and full collateralization. However, it does not disclose a reserve-co | anthropic: confirmed — The claim directly answers the SLOT QUESTION (reserve asset class, share, valuation basis, residual categories). Both quoted passages appear verbatim in the archived source: 'Jokainen digitaalinen NVD

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source supports that NVDAx is backed 1:1 by NVIDIA Corporation common stock held by a third-party custodian and describes xStocks as fully collateralized. However, it provides no as-of d | anthropic: confirmed — The cited Kraken NVDAx page directly supports every material claim: it states each NVDAx token is pegged 1:1 to real NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock held by a third-party custodian ("Jokainen digitaal

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: confirmed — The archived content from the cited source app.rwa.xyz/assets/NVDAx explicitly states under the Legal & Regulatory section: 'Issuer / Backed Assets / Issuer LEI / 984500001AB7C6C7F577'. This verbatim

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 865bc0f1-a45a-4ce2-a357-03b2c23c50bf: Both claims directly classify the underlying asset as tokenized equity, but the incumbent's own evidence is more specific: it states that each NVDAx token is backed 1:1 by actual NVIDIA Corporation common shares held by a third-party custodian. With equal classification and stronger asset-backing detail, the incumbent wins.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 926f5146-b25b-4b5d-af78-f079397c08fe: The incumbent directly addresses the token, the holder’s rights and redemption claim, and the backing arrangement. Its own evidence supports 1:1 share backing, regulated third-party custody, absence of shareholder rights, and redemption through the named entity Backed, making it more specific and complete.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent a27ea24f-02e0-4dca-8d1a-d9b7c9ee5dfa: The new claim directly lists three named security-relevant Token-2022 extensions and their observed configuration, while the incumbent only gives a vague count. Both cite equally weak evidence with no quote, so the new claim is more specific.

Verifier note: sibling-consistency: superseded by STRCx evidence

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken announcement supports that Mark Greenberg is Kraken’s Global Head of Consumer and publicly ties him to xStocks Opt-In Rewards, which answers the slot question. However, it does no | anthropic(sub:gpt): unsupported — goal-fit: The Kraken announcement supports that Mark Greenberg is Kraken’s Global Head of Consumer and publicly ties him to xStocks Opt-In Rewards, which answers the key-people slot. It does not estab [duplicate actual family allowed by substitution]

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Solana Explorer page supports that the address is a Token-2022 mint, but the claim does not provide the key document’s required type (prospectus/terms/attestation/audit/fact-sheet) | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The slot question asks for a key document classified as one of {prospectus/terms/attestation/audit/fact-sheet} with a date and original-source URL. While the archived Solana Explorer page do | kimi: unsupported — goal-fit: the slot requires key documents of type prospectus/terms/attestation/audit/fact-sheet with a date and source URL. The claimed 'document' is a Solana Explorer on-chain Token-2022 mint record,

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The explorer confirms that the mint uses an updatable UI-display multiplier, but it does not answer what the issuer may change without holder consent under its legal terms. The cited materia | anthropic: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | kimi: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: “$1,000 per Note” states the principal amount or denomination of each Note, not a minimum initial subscription or purchase requirement. | anthropic: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Verifier note: re-adjudicated 2026-08-05T23:44:56.198Z from rejected status | panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources describe NVDAx as tracking NVIDIA stock and CMC AI says it is backed 1:1 by NVIDIA shares, but neither provides a dated holding disclosure establishing NVIDIA common stock as the | anthropic: confirmed — Both cited sources support that NVDAx's underlying reference is NVIDIA Corporation stock. RWA.xyz states 'Tokenized version of NVIDIA Corporation.' and CoinMarketCap states NVDAX 'tracks the price of

Verifier note: re-adjudicated 2026-08-05T23:41:17.063Z from rejected status | panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources describe NVDAX as tracking NVIDIA stock and being backed 1:1 by NVIDIA shares, but the claimed holding fact provides neither a portfolio weight nor an as-of date, both required b | anthropic: unsupported — The bare description 'Tokenized version of NVIDIA Corporation' is confirmed by RWA.xyz, but the specific claim value hinges on two things the fetched sources do not solidly support. (1) 'NVIDIA Corpor