NVIDIA xStock

Unsupported by provided evidence.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent f8459483-e1f3-4aeb-809d-79df70c31e4f: The new claim precisely matches its cited evidence: investors must confirm eligibility and complete account verification through Kraken. The incumbent adds unsupported specificity by characterizing eligibility as geographic. Neither provides thresholds or turnaround, so the incumbent's extra evidence does not make it better supported.

Unsupported and possibly incomplete on investor classes.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited page addresses purchases through Kraken and withdrawal to compatible self-hosted wallets, not investor eligibility for direct mint/redemption versus secondary-market holding. It do | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The source does support the claim's literal assertions — the FAQ states only Kraken retail/individual clients in certain countries may buy xStocks incl. NVDAx ("Vain Krakenin yksityisasiakka

Unsupported by provided evidence.

Verifier note: re-adjudicated 2026-08-04T18:27:04.661Z from rejected status | panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=2, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The sources identify 1:1 collateralization, arbitrage, oracle-fed stock data, and a Raydium swap, but they do not establish that failures of arbitrage or oracle transmission have pushed—or c | anthropic: unsupported — The CMC source affirms only the positive side: "Price tracking is maintained through this 1:1 collateralization and arbitrage mechanisms, with oracles feeding real-time stock data on-chain." It names | kimi: confirmed — Source 1 (CMC AI) states NVDAX price tracking 'is maintained through this 1:1 collateralization and arbitrage mechanisms, with oracles feeding real-time stock data on-chain' — this directly establishe

Unsupported and under-scoped.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 130c7c88-84bf-496b-bc1e-8ff18545fb41: The incumbent directly addresses registration status and regulatory approval, naming HSBC, SEC and state securities commissions, Rule 433, registration number 333-277211, and the June 18, 2026 filing date. Its SEC filing evidence directly supports those details. The new claim addresses restricted investors but identifies eligible purchasers only vaguely by geography and eligibility without naming the permitted jurisdictions.

Unsupported and overlaps risk_custodian; not a genuine credit disclosure.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent df757102-e0cc-4da5-a45b-3c05d74c541b: The new claim directly identifies HSBC USA Inc. as the payment-obligated counterparty whose credit failure exposes holders, and its evidence expressly establishes senior unsecured issuer credit risk and the absence of FDIC insurance or bank guarantees. The incumbent identifies a custodian and 1:1 share backing but does not establish from its cited evidence how Alpaca Securities’ failure would affect holders.

Unsupported by provided evidence.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 5d6612ac-f08e-4cc8-8332-cf5ded0f456c: The incumbent directly links NVDAx’s tracked asset to a specific deterioration risk in NVIDIA’s underlying business: additional export controls affecting named H20 products during the first half of Fiscal 2026. Its evidence supports both the tracking relationship and the issuer’s specific risk disclosure. The new claim states only the generic consequence that a share-price decline could cause total loss, without identifying a concrete business or yield-source deterioration.

Not supported by shown evidence and likely mis-scoped as a redemption path.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source expressly supports selling NVDAx directly on Kraken for U.S. dollars, cryptocurrency, or stablecoins, but the value does not fully answer the slot: it omits settlement timing, min | anthropic: confirmed — The archived Finnish content contains the claimed quote verbatim in the FAQ answer to 'Voinko lunastaa ostamiani tokenisoituja NVIDIA -tuotteita perustana oleviksi osakkeiksi?': 'Tokenien haltijat voi

Evidence 1bc9bf76 quote uses 'e.g., BitGo, Alpaca Securities'; the candidate drops the illustrative qualifier.

Evidence 1bc9bf76 says only 'held in custody by regulated institutions' with no named regulator or segregation model.

Verifier note: WARNING: evidence class mismatch; substance and goal-fit review required | panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited CMC AI page names BitGo and Alpaca Securities as examples of custodians for real NVDA shares, but it provides no regulator or charter for either entity and no account-segregation m | anthropic: unsupported — The only fetched source is an explicitly AI-generated CMC page (dated 02 Aug 2026, carrying the disclaimer 'CMC AI can make mistakes'). It does present the verbatim quoted string, but it names BitGo a

Supportable claim is limited to: underlying shares held by an unnamed regulated third-party custodian.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 179e9f92-04a4-4fb9-8047-4e5bcf2bebb1: Both claims directly identify Alpaca Securities LLC as custodian and cite identical supporting evidence, but the incumbent is more specific because it includes the legal identifier 0001702580. It therefore wins on specificity.

Issuer entity is Backed Finance (issuer of the tracker certificate under Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19); offered/distributed via xStocks. Only SPV jurisdiction is unknown.

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=2, disputed) | gpt: contradicted — goal-fit: The cited RWA.xyz record distinguishes the platform/brand (“Offered by xStocks”; “Platform: xStocks”) from the legal issuer, which it identifies as “Backed Assets,” with LEI 984500001AB7C6C7 | anthropic: contradicted — The claim asserts "the corpus does not identify the issuing SPV or its jurisdiction," but the RWA.xyz archived content directly does both. Under Legal & Regulatory it states Issuer: "Backed Assets", I

Supported: each token is 1:1 collateralized/pegged to NVIDIA common stock held by a regulated third-party custodian (as of 2026-08-04).

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — The Kraken page states that each NVDAx token is linked 1:1 to real NVIDIA Corporation common shares held by a third-party custodian and describes NVDAx as fully collateralized. However, the cited cont | anthropic: confirmed — The cited Kraken page states verbatim that each NVDAx token is pegged 1:1 to real NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock shares held by an external custodian ('Jokainen digitaalinen NVDAx -token on sidottu s

rwa-other is acceptable as the residual class for tokenized single-name equity.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: confirmed — The cited issuer/product documentation identifies the underlying asset as NVIDIA Corporation common stock: each NVDAx token is backed 1:1 by actual shares held by a third-party custodian. The token pr | anthropic: contradicted — The cited Kraken source unambiguously identifies the underlying asset as NVIDIA Corporation Common Stock — a publicly-listed equity traded on NASDAQ, held 1:1 by a third-party custodian. The quoted te

Unverifiable.

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: confirmed — The fetched rwa.xyz page for NVDAx contains, under the 'Legal & Regulatory' > 'Terms' field, the exact string 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)', matching the claimed quote verbatim. This estab | kimi: unsupported — goal-fit: the slot requires one fact per key document giving type, date, and the URL at the original source; the claim itself concedes date undisclosed and original-source URL unavailable, so it does

Internal inconsistency across slots.

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The archived content is genuinely this Kraken NVDAx page and all three quoted passages appear verbatim in it, so the quotes themselves are supported. However, the SLOT QUESTION requires each | kimi: confirmed — The archived snapshot is exactly the Kraken NVDAx product page at the claimed URL (kraken.com/mx/xstocks/nvdax), containing product description, FAQ, and risk disclosures — consistent with the claimed

Wrong slot and unsupported; issuer-failure/what-survives is unanswered.

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited Kraken page supports that NVDAx provides indirect NVIDIA exposure without ownership, voting, information, or other underlying-shareholder rights. However, this describes the ordina | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The SLOT QUESTION asks what holders lose and what survives if the issuer itself fails, is fraudulent, or walks away (counterparty/insolvency risk). The claim instead describes the nature of | kimi: unsupported — evidence class mismatch. The claim's substance (indirect exposure; no ownership, voting, information, or other shareholder rights) is accurately reflected on the Kraken NVDAx product page, but that pa

Overreach; evidence shows secondary trading occurred, not a redemption mechanism.

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The cited transaction-history snippets show successful Raydium and Jupiter-labeled instructions involving the token, but they do not establish that token holders can exit, identify the swaps | anthropic: unsupported — goal-fit: The slot demands, per disclosed exit path, method + settlement timing + minimum + caps/gates + fee. The claim only asserts that holders can swap on Raydium/Jupiter 'subject to available mark | kimi: unsupported — The archived explorer history shows one successful "Raydium Clmm: Swap V2" and one "Jupiter: Route" transaction touching the token's address, which establishes that the token appears in Raydium/Jupite

These two facts are the only NVDA-linked evidence present, and they belong to the HSBC USA Autocallable Notes.

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — The SEC filing establishes that the described HSBC notes have a single Reference Asset—NVIDIA Corporation common stock—and that the stock trades under NVDA. However, it never identifies or discusses “ | anthropic: confirmed — The SEC free writing prospectus (regulator-class, an assigned required evidence class) directly states the Reference Asset is 'The common stock of NVIDIA Corporation (Ticker: NVDA) (the "Company").' a | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The SEC-filed prospectus supports that NVIDIA Corporation common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under “NVDA,” but this identification fact does not address concentration in

No on-chain attack-surface or admin-key disclosure for any NVDAx token exists in the evidence.

Verifier note: lost head-to-head to incumbent 28bb2e66-a9f3-45f1-9f1b-98e0dd2e53d8: The incumbent more fully answers the attack-surface slot by identifying four distinct authority capabilities, each supported by its own cited evidence: default account freezing, pausing, permanent-delegate transfers or burns, and an updatable UI-amount multiplier.

The corpus contains no redemption-fee data for any NVDAx/Backed product; this candidate must be dropped.

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | anthropic: unsupported — evidence class mismatch | gpt: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

admin_powers should also list the updatable scaled-UI multiplier authority per ev:3e460aa8.

Verifier note: panel 1/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The source confirms that the mint has enabled permanent-delegate and pausable-config extensions and describes their powers. However, it does not identify the addresses or entities holding th | anthropic: confirmed — Both material assertions map verbatim to the archived Solana Explorer token-extensions page for NVIDIA xStock (mint Xsc9qvGR1efVDFGLrVsmkzv3qi45LTBjeUKSPmx9qEh). The Permanent Delegate extension reads

unknown

Verifier note: panel 0/2 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt: unsupported — goal-fit: The aggregator says NVDAX can be used in third-party DeFi protocols for lending, borrowing, or earning yield, but it does not answer how yield reaches holders—NAV accrual, rebase, or distrib | anthropic: unsupported — evidence class mismatch

Sole cited ID 991ee3e9 is absent from the corpus. The existence of 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)' cannot be verified against the supplied evidence.

Verifier note: panel 1/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=1, disputed) | gpt-family: unsupported — The archived RWA.xyz page names “Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)” under Terms, but RWA.xyz is not assigned regulator evidence and does not provide the document date or an original-source URL. | anthropic-family: confirmed — The archived rwa.xyz page for NVDAx contains a 'Terms' field reading exactly 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)', matching the claimed quote verbatim. The claim identifies this as the final-term | kimi-family: unsupported — goal-fit: the slot question requires each key document's type, date, and original-source URL. The cited rwa.xyz page confirms only that a document named 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)' exist

unverifiable

Verifier note: panel 0/3 confirmed (sourceDomains=2, disputed) | gpt-family: unsupported — goal-fit: “tracker certificate” describes the investment instrument, not the legal wrapper protecting holders (such as an LP, trust, SPV, or foundation). The cited RWA.xyz registry also identifies Bac | anthropic-family: contradicted — The tracker-certificate framing (CMC AI: 'tracker certificate issued by entities like Backed Finance') and the 'Backed Assets Final Terms Nr 19 (NVDAx)' terms reference (rwa.xyz) are both supported. H | kimi-family: unsupported — Two problems. (1) The 'tracker certificate' characterization rests solely on an AI-generated CMC article that hedges — 'issued by entities like Backed Finance' — which is vaguer than claimed and infer