Hastra PRIME (PRIME)

Verifier note panel 1/4 confirmed (agreement=5, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra materials support that users stake/deposit wYLDS to receive PRIME, and that PRIME’s stated yield source is Demo/“Democratized Prime” HELOC lending. They also support Hastra’s stated | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Several sub-claims are corroborated by the union of fetched sources: wYLDS being backed 1:1 by YLDS (Hastra help page verbatim), YLDS being an SEC-registered face-amount certificate issued by FCC and | google/gemini-3.6-flash: confirmed — All material claims in the narrative are supported by the provided sources: 1) Hastra's documentation confirms that wYLDS is backed 1:1 by YLDS in Hastra's reserve, and PRIME represents staked wYLDS. | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: contradicted — The Hastra page supports the stated mechanism as a Hastra representation: each wYLDS is said to be backed 1:1 by YLDS in Hastra’s reserve. YLDS’s site supports that YLDS is an unsecured face-amount ce

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched materials support that YLDS/Figure Certificates are interest-bearing debt/fixed-income securities and that interest is paid monthly (with YLDS interest paid in kind on the first business d | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The ylds.com quote about interest being paid in kind on the first business day of the month is confirmed verbatim in the fetched FAQ. However, the SEC filing quote 'debt instruments' is not actually p

Verifier note unsupported — The fetched page does support that Hastra has a public page titled “Proof of Reserves” and shows fields for wYLDS, Provenance, and Figure Markets Democratized Prime, including a Provenance vault-address label and a Figure Markets sweep-address label. However, the actual addresses are absent from the fetched content, and the source does not establish that the page is continuously updated, that the displayed items are on-chain addresses/balances, or that it constitutes an ongoing self-published reserve attestation rather than a periodic third-party audit. Those characterizations exceed the evidence provided. | quote: "## Proof of Reserves As of 10:11:06 PM ### ... Provenance 1. **Vault Address:** 2. **YLDS Balance:** 848,919.65 3. **USDC Balance:** 0.05 ### ... Democratized Prime 1. **Sweep Address:** 4. **24 hr Earnings:** 73,798.57"

Verifier note unsupported — The fetched RWA.xyz page explicitly supports that PRIME has a 0% subscription fee and an instant subscription time. However, it does not establish the stronger attribution that the fee is charged by “neither issuer nor protocol.” Moreover, the page lists a separate “Hastra platform fee of 50 bps deducted from yield,” so the broad no-fee attribution is not supported by the cited content. | quote: "Subscription Time Instant Min. Investment — Subscription Fees 0 %"

Verifier note panel 1/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The YLDS homepage directly supports that YLDS reserves are reported quarterly in financial statements/public periodic reports filed with the SEC, and it states both “Annual audit: Big Four Audited” an | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: confirmed — The re-fetched ylds.com page directly supports both cited quotes and the substance of the claim. It explicitly states 'Annual audit: Big Four Audited' and 'Registered security. Audits from a Big Four

Verifier note unsupported — The source explicitly lists PRIME's Redemption Time as “Instant” and Redemption Fees as “0 %,” supporting those portions. However, it does not establish that the fee is charged by neither the issuer nor the protocol. Moreover, it discloses a separate “Hastra platform fee of 50 bps deducted from yield,” so the broad characterization of no issuer/protocol charge is not supported by the cited content. | quote: "Redemption Time Instant Minimum Redemption Amount — Redemption Fees 0 %"

Verifier note unsupported — The re-fetched RWA.xyz page supports only that redemption time is listed as “Instant,” the minimum redemption amount is shown as “—,” and redemption fees are 0%. It does not establish that holders unstake PRIME at any time, that a vault burns PRIME and returns wYLDS 1:1, that there is no redemption cap, or that continuously accrued yield is realized upon unstaking. The alleged Token Terminal excerpt was not included in the live re-fetched content, so those additional mechanics cannot be verified from the provided material. | quote: "Redemption Time Instant Minimum Redemption Amount — Redemption Fees 0 %"

Verifier note unsupported — The filing supports that Figure Certificate Company is the “Fund,” is a face-amount certificate company under Section 4(1) of the 1940 Act, must maintain Section 28(a) required reserves with its Custodian (and potentially additional custodians), and that the Custodian is not responsible for ensuring compliance with required reserves. It also defines Assets as securities, underlying shares, monies, and other property held for the Fund’s benefit. However, the agreement leaves the Custodian unidentified as “[CUSTODIAN]” and does not establish that FCC itself is a custodian. Nor does the provided content establish that FCC issues YLDS/wYLDS, that those certificates underlie Democratized Prime, or that PRIME deposits into them. “Qualified bank/trust custodian” is also not stated verbatim, though the agreement says the Custodian has qualifications prescribed by Section 26(a)(1). | quote: "“The Fund shall, from time to time, deliver to and maintain with Custodian (and, in the Fund's sole discretion, one or more additional custodians) qualified investments having at all times an aggregate value at least equal to the amount the Fund is required to maintain as reserves pursuant to Sectio"

Verifier note unsupported — The cited SEC prospectus directly supports the prospectus date, the Certificates’ unsecured status and sole backing by FCC assets, the non-bank/non-deposit/non-FDIC-insured disclosures, and the exchange/ATS/peer-to-peer trading statements. However, the provided source does not establish the claim’s linkage that these Certificates are specifically the YLDS/wYLDS instruments “underlying PRIME’s Democratized Prime structure.” The source refers to Figure Transferable and Figure Installment Certificates, but does not mention PRIME, Democratized Prime, YLDS, or wYLDS. Thus the compound claim as stated is not fully supported by the provided content. | quote: "“Figure Certificates (as defined below) are unsecured and solely backed by the assets of Figure Certificate Company.”"

Verifier note panel 1/3 confirmed (agreement=4) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports that PRIME yield comes from Demo Prime’s real-world HELOC lending: it says DP “lends to real estate borrowers using HELOC products,” that PRIME is “backed by actual ho | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: confirmed — The re-fetched page confirms the core assertions: PRIME's yield originates from 'Demo Prime (DP)' which 'Lends to real estate borrowers using HELOC products' and is 'Backed by actual home equity lines | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided source confirms that Demo Prime / Democratized Prime is a yield-generating HELOC lending pool that backs PRIME. However, the source does not mention 'Figure' as the provider/entity behind

Verifier note unsupported — The live RWA.xyz page expressly supports that Hastra charges a 50 bps platform fee and that it is deducted from yield. However, it does not establish that 50 bps means “0.50% annualized,” nor does it specify the claimed mechanics that the fee is taken before distribution to PRIME holders from the spread between the Democratized Prime pool clearing rate/wYLDS interest and the holder rate. Those additional details make the full claim more specific than the cited source supports. | quote: "Other Fees Hastra platform fee of 50 bps deducted from yield."

Verifier note unsupported — The live Proof of Reserves page does show a Provenance-line item labeled “wYLDS pending redemption” with a balance of 339,294.36. This supports the narrow observation that a pending-redemption balance existed. However, the source does not state that PRIME-to-wYLDS redemption is instant, does not identify the pending amount as final settlement into USDC or underlying cash, and does not explain that this balance represents a queue or establish a non-instantaneous settlement process “at every layer.” The stated July 2026 observation date is also not evidenced by the page content provided. | quote: "**wYLDS pending redemption:** 339,294.36"

Verifier note unsupported — The filing supports FCC’s ownership chain and the August 2025 recombination / September 12, 2025 IPO chronology. However, it does not mention wYLDS, YLDS, PRIME, or a “Democratized Prime” structure, nor does it establish that any wYLDS/YLDS leg is issued as Figure Certificates. Therefore the full claim is not established by the provided source. | quote: "“FMHI indirectly, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, owns all of the equity of FCC, comprised of 1,000 shares of common stock. In August 2025, FTS and FMHI recombined their businesses through a series of transactions. As a result of this recombination, FMHI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of FTS."

Verifier note unsupported — The live Hastra page supports only that wYLDS—not PRIME—may be redeemed through Hastra or swapped for USDC on Raydium or Uniswap. It does not establish PRIME liquidity, Orca, Uniswap V3 or a PRIME/USDC Ethereum pair, nor the asserted instant settlement, prevailing-pool-price mechanics, absence of protocol minimums/caps, slippage/liquidity exposure, or fee comparison. No live content from the holder.io citation is provided. | quote: "Easily redeem your wYLDS through Hastra, or swap for USDC in Raydium or Uniswap"

Verifier note unsupported — The fetched help.hastra.io page confirms that Hastra operates a public help center and lists the specified PRIME, integration, and risk articles. However, it does not establish that this is the issuer’s “primary” user-facing documentation set, nor does it state that the materials are provided “rather than a formal legal prospectus.” Those comparative/characterization elements are unsupported by the supplied content. | quote: "❔ What is PRIME (Staked wYLDS)? ... 🔣 How Is the PRIME Rate Determined? ... 🛠️ Integration Guides ... 📘 Hastra ETH Programmatic Integration Guide ... 📗 Hastra SOL Programmatic Integration Guide ... 📚 DeFi Guides ... 📃 Risks Article"

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched SEC filing content is consistent with a Figure filing for the period ending 2026-03-31 (CIK 0002064124 and dates shown), but the supplied fetched text does not contain the claimed quotatio | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The fetched content from the cited SEC URL consists solely of XBRL context/tag definitions (dates, entity IDs, member tags) and contains no narrative text at all. Nowhere in the retrieved content does | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched text from the cited SEC Form 10-Q filing (figr-20260331.htm) does not contain any reference to 'Signum Ltd.' or 'Hastra'.

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=4) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched YLDS homepage expressly supports Figure Equity Solutions, Inc. as the SEC-registered transfer agent managing/recording YLDS issuances and transfers, and Figure Investment Advisors, LLC as | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The claim lists seven service providers. Of these, three are supported by the re-fetched content: Figure Certificate Company (named as issuer, e.g., 'YLDS and its issuer, Figure Certificate Company'), | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While Figure Certificate Company, Figure Investment Advisors LLC, Figure Equity Solutions Inc., and Informal Systems are verified by the fetched sources, the remaining listed service providers are not

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=6) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched RWA.xyz page confirms that Hastra is incubated by Figure Technologies and the Provenance Blockchain Foundation. The Hastra help page confirms that PRIME is supplied to a HELOC+ lending poo | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Two of the four cited URLs (the GlobeNewswire release and the GitHub repo) were not actually re-fetched—no live content for them was provided—so their claims cannot be verified against the union of fe | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the fetched sources confirm that Hastra was incubated by Figure Technologies and the Provenance Blockchain Foundation, utilizes tokens (wYLDS, PRIME, AUTO), channels yield from HELOC lending, an | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched RWA.xyz page supports that Hastra is incubated by Figure Technologies and the Provenance Blockchain Foundation. The Hastra help page supports that Hastra charges PRIME holders a 0.50% annu

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra terms support that Signum Ltd. is a BVI company providing the Hastra DeFi application/protocol; that access is barred to U.S. residents, citizens, and persons located in the United | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The core claims about YLDS being SEC-registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a face-amount certificate, issued by Figure Certificate Company (FCC), are supported by the CrowdfundInsider | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The fetched content from hastra.io/terms supports that PRIME/wYLDS are DeFi tokens issued via Signum Ltd (BVI), that US persons and comprehensively sanctioned parties are excluded, and that YLDS is re

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=4) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The audit report supports that Figure engaged Informal Systems in September 2025; that the work ran from September 24 to November 18, 2025; that the initial review found nine issues including one Crit | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The only source actually re-fetched and shown is the Hastra/Informal Systems audit PDF. That document fully supports the audit-related claims: it confirms the Sept 24–Nov 18, 2025 timeframe, the 9 ini | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided fetched sources only include the Informal Systems audit report for Hastra's Solana programs. No source content was fetched to support the claims regarding Figure co-founder Mike Cagney's | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The audit report supports that Informal Systems audited the Hastra vault-mint and vault-stake Solana programs in two phases from September 24 to November 18, 2025; identified one Critical finding in t

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched RWA.xyz content states only that Hastra is "incubated by Figure Technologies and Provenance Blockchain Foundation." It does not characterize them as backers or investors, and it provides n | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The live re-fetch of app.rwa.xyz/platforms/hastra confirms only that 'Hastra is incubated by Figure Technologies and Provenance Blockchain Foundation,' matching the claimed quote for those two entitie | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched content from app.rwa.xyz confirms that Hastra is incubated by Figure Technologies and Provenance Blockchain Foundation. However, no re-fetched content was provided for the Wikipedia sou

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only live-refetched content provided is the Solana integration guide. It describes deposit and redemption mechanics and exchange-rate calculations, but does not expressly state that mint/deposit o | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Only one of the two cited sources was actually re-fetched (the Hastra SOL Programmatic Integration Guide). Its content is a detailed technical walkthrough of the mint (USDC→wYLDS), stake (wYLDS→PRIME)

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched pages confirm that YLDS are unsecured obligations solely backed by FCC’s assets, that FCC is the issuer, and that FCC is a subsidiary of Figure Markets Holdings. They also expressly warn t | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The cited pages do state that YLDS certificates are unsecured, backed solely by FCC's own assets, not FDIC-insured, and not guaranteed by any bank or government agency — and that if FCC suffers losses | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided source text does not explicitly mention bankruptcy remoteness or state that 'bankruptcy_remote = false'. Although the disclosures state that YLDS are unsecured face-amount certificates so

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The report supports that Informal Systems audited the specified Hastra programs in two phases from September 24 to November 18, 2025, and that the initial assessment identified 1 Critical, 4 Medium, 2 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The source confirms Informal Systems' two-phase audit of Hastra's vault-mint and vault-stake Solana programs ran Sept 24–Nov 18, 2025, and that the *initial* phase found exactly 1 Critical, 4 Medium, | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While Informal Systems did perform an audit of Hastra's vault-mint and vault-stake Solana programs from September 24 to November 18, 2025, and all issues were reported as thoroughly resolved prior to

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra materials support several core risk disclosures: the Terms identify Signum Ltd. as a BVI company and wholly owned subsidiary of Provenance Cayman Foundation, while the Privacy Polic | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The fetched hastra.io/terms and hastra.io/privacy pages corroborate several parts of the claim: they confirm the Signum Ltd. (BVI, subsidiary of Provenance Cayman Foundation) identity in the Terms, th | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the fetched sources confirm that Hastra's materials inconsistently describe the operating entity as Signum Ltd. (BVI / Cayman Foundation subsidiary) in the Terms of Use and as Hastra Technologie | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Terms support that Signum Ltd. is a BVI company, wholly owned by Provenance Cayman Foundation, and provides the Hastra application/services; the Privacy Policy also identifies Signum Ltd.

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra Terms support that U.S. persons are ineligible and expressly list Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and the Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk regions among prohibited locations. However, they do not es | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: contradicted — The only source actually re-fetched (hastra.io/terms) no longer contains the quoted KYC language at all — there is no mention of 'KYC' anywhere in the current Eligibility section, contradicting the cl | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided live content supports the exclusion of US persons and specific sanctioned jurisdictions (such as Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk regions). However, the live source doe

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports that users deposit/stake wYLDS and receive PRIME, that PRIME yield is associated with Demo Prime/HELOC lending operations, and that unstaking is available. The YLDS pa | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The two fetched pages support several parts of the claim: PRIME is described as a liquid-staking token received by staking wYLDS, with 'no rebasing - token count stays stable' (consistent with, though | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the sources confirm that PRIME is a liquid staking token obtained by staking wYLDS on Hastra to earn yield from HELOC lending operations (Demo Prime) and that YLDS is issued by Figure Certificat | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra page supports that users deposit/stake wYLDS and receive PRIME, and that PRIME is transferable and can be unstaked at any time—reasonably supporting its characterization as a liquid staking

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched terms expressly support that Hastra has sole discretion to determine user eligibility and state that it does not guarantee the amount, timing, or consistency of wYLDS distributions. Howeve | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched hastra.io/terms page confirms two of the claim's components: (1) Hastra's sole discretion over eligibility determinations ("Hastra reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to determi

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The YLDS homepage confirms that KYC-completed holders can redeem for fiat through Figure Markets’ website or app, and describes redemption as “as fast as same day” with “Credit-line-backed liquidity.” | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched ylds.com content confirms several elements: KYC'd holders can redeem directly via Figure Markets (FAQ: 'KYC'ed holders of YLDS can redeem for fiat through figuremarkets.com or the Figur | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The retrieved text supports that KYC'd holders can redeem YLDS via figuremarkets.com or the Figure Markets mobile app, settled as fast as same day via credit-line-backed liquidity, with a minimum of o

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=4) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched PDF metadata identifies a “Figure Q4 2025” Hastra vault-mint/vault-stake Solana-programs summary audit report and links to relevant repositories, but the supplied fetched content does not | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The PDF fetched from hastra.io returns raw, largely uncompressed/binary PDF stream data. The only human-readable text is metadata: '/Title (Figure Q4 2025: Hastra vault-mint & vault-stake Solana progr | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The fetched sources do not support several material claims. Specifically, the source content for Mike Cagney's Wikipedia page was not provided in the fetched sources, leaving the claims about his depa

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=3, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The YLDS page supports that YLDS are unsecured face-amount certificates, solely backed by FCC’s assets, and are not FDIC-insured (nor backed/guaranteed by a bank or financial institution). It also war | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Most of the narrative is backed by the fetched sources: ylds.com's disclosures confirm YLDS are 'unsecured face-amount certificates ... solely backed by the assets of FCC' and explicitly state they ar | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the fetched content from ylds.com supports the claim that YLDS are unsecured face-amount certificates solely backed by the assets of Figure Certificate Company (FCC) and are not FDIC insured, th | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — FCC’s YLDS disclosure directly supports that YLDS certificates are not FDIC insured, are unsecured, are solely backed by FCC assets, and that FCC may lack resources to meet obligations after asset los

Verifier note panel 1/3 confirmed (agreement=4, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: confirmed — Hastra’s live wYLDS documentation explicitly states: “Each wYLDS is backed 1:1 with YLDS held in Hastra’s reserve,” and describes the reserve as backing issued wYLDS tokens “1:1.” This directly suppor | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: contradicted — The claim asserts a 100% collateralization ratio for the underlying, supported by two quotes. The first (Hastra help page) does confirm wYLDS is 'backed 1:1 with YLDS held in Hastra's reserve' — but t | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The claimed quote from ylds.com ('Percentage of required reserve covered: 100%; Excess / (deficit) reserve: 0.5%.') is completely absent from the cited source. While Hastra states that wYLDS is backed

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: error — AI_APICallError: The operation was aborted | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The live re-fetch of hastra.io/terms (cited twice) returned completely empty markdown content with no actual text, meaning the quoted statements about wYLDS not being SEC-registered and about US-perso | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The live content re-fetched from the cited sources is either empty (hastra.io/terms) or missing completely, providing no text to verify the registration status of YLDS, Figure Certificate Company, PRI

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The disclosures establish that YLDS are unsecured obligations of FCC, backed solely by FCC’s assets, and that losses on those assets could leave FCC unable to pay principal or interest. This supports | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The quotes accurately describe YLDS certificates as unsecured obligations of FCC, backed solely by FCC's own assets, and expose holders to the risk that FCC may lack sufficient resources to pay intere | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched source text does not mention bankruptcy or explicitly state the bankruptcy remoteness status of Figure Certificate Company (FCC) or YLDS certificates. Inferring `bankruptcy_remote = fal

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The re-fetched cited source (https://hastra.io/terms) contains no terms text supporting any unilateral-change right. Even the quoted language, if authentic, addresses modification of the Terms only; i | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Only one of the two cited sources (https://hastra.io/terms) was re-fetched, and the live fetch returned no substantive body content—just the page title 'Hastra-Fi | Pushing Forward the Future of Finan

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched wYLDS page expressly supports a secondary DEX route for wYLDS: it says users may trade wYLDS on Raydium and may “trade back to USDC through Raydium and Kamino protocols.” However, the fetc | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The wYLDS help-doc confirms that wYLDS can be bought with USDC and traded on Raydium, and can be 'traded back to USDC through Raydium and Kamino protocols.' However, the claim adds several specifics t

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched wYLDS page supports that wYLDS may be traded on Solana DEXs, specifically stating users can trade it back to USDC through Raydium and Kamino. It does not establish the full stated redempti | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The wYLDS source confirms swapping wYLDS back to USDC via Raydium and Kamino, matching part of the claim. However, the claim also asserts Orca as one of the supported DEXs, and neither source mentions

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only fetched source contains no substantive content supporting the claimed PRIME structure or risk chain. It does not establish that PRIME yield comes from HELOC borrower interest, that Figure Tec | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The claim rests on layered credit exposure across HELOC borrowers, Figure Technologies, and Figure Certificate Company/YLDS-wYLDS backing. Only one of the two cited sources was actually re-fetched (ha

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The YLDS source supports that YLDS are unsecured face-amount certificates solely backed by FCC assets, are not FDIC insured, and that losses on FCC assets could leave FCC without sufficient resources | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The YLDS-related quote is verified verbatim on ylds.com: 'YLDS are unsecured face-amount certificates and solely backed by the assets of Figure Certificate Company (FCC)... nor are they insured by the | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The YLDS homepage supports the description of YLDS: it states that YLDS are “unsecured face-amount certificates,” “solely backed by the assets of Figure Certificate Company (FCC),” and are not FDIC in

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched guide supports that PRIME→wYLDS redemption is an on-chain atomic transfer from the stake vault, and that wYLDS→USDC is an operator-mediated request_redeem/complete_redeem process requiring | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched Solana integration guide confirms the general redemption mechanics: PRIME→wYLDS is atomic and uncapped in the fetched text, but wYLDS→USDC requires an operator-mediated two-step request

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: contradicted — The available Solana integration guide directly states that PRIME redemption is a “single-step direct redemption” with “no unbonding period or queuing,” and that the on-chain unbonding period is perma | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The hastra.io/terms page fetch returned no body text at all (title only, likely JS-rendered content not captured), so the claimed quote 'may be subject to delays, lock-up periods, or other restriction

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The refetched Hastra page supports that wYLDS is backed 1:1 by YLDS held in Hastra’s reserve and that “Hastra uses these funds to purchase YLDS from Figure Markets.” It does not support the asserted F | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Only the help.hastra.io/wylds/what-is-wylds source was actually re-fetched, and it does confirm the specific quoted line "Hastra uses these funds to purchase YLDS from Figure Markets." However, the tw | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports the narrow statement that Hastra “uses these funds to purchase YLDS from Figure Markets,” and says YLDS is held in Hastra’s reserve backing wYLDS 1:1. However, it does

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched PDF payload exposes metadata identifying a “Figure Q4 2025” Hastra vault-mint/vault-stake Solana-programs summary audit report and links to relevant GitHub repositories, but it does not pr | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched content is raw, undecoded PDF binary/stream data (FlateDecode-compressed objects) rather than human-readable text. While the PDF metadata title ('Hastra vault-mint & vault-stake Solana

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: contradicted — The overall PRIME staking/redemption mechanism is supported: USDC deposits mint wYLDS 1:1; wYLDS deposits mint PRIME; PRIME supply does not rebase; newly minted wYLDS rewards increase the PRIME/wYLDS | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Most of the narrative is well supported by the union of the two fetched pages: USDC→wYLDS 1:1 minting, staking wYLDS to mint PRIME, PRIME's non-rebasing design with yield compounding into the PRIME/wY | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the sources support the mechanisms of converting USDC 1:1 to wYLDS, staking wYLDS to mint non-rebasing PRIME, compounding yield via newly minted wYLDS in the vault to appreciate the exchange rat

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=6) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only re-fetched cited source, https://hastra.io/terms, contains no substantive terms or legal-entity content. No live fetched evidence supports that Signum Ltd. is a BVI company, operates as Hastr | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched content for https://hastra.io/terms shows only a page title ('Hastra-Fi | Pushing Forward the Future of Finance') with no markdown body text at all — the claimed quote about Signum Ltd. | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched live content from https://hastra.io/terms contains no body text or legal disclaimers supporting the existence of Signum Ltd., its BVI jurisdiction, or its ownership by Provenance Cayman

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only re-fetched source, https://hastra.io/terms, contains no Terms of Service text—only the page title—and therefore does not substantiate that it governs Signum Ltd./Hastra’s DeFi application, el | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The live re-fetch of https://hastra.io/terms returned only a page title ('Hastra-Fi | Pushing Forward the Future of Finance') with no markdown body content at all — the page appears to be a JS-rendere | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched content from https://hastra.io/terms is empty and contains no text to confirm the terms of service, entity details, domicile, quotes, or update date. The second source (https://docs.has

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=6) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched page confirms that PRIME is non-rebasing (“your token count stays stable”), yields accrue continuously, and interest is realized upon redemption/unstaking. It does not state that yield com | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The quoted text is verbatim accurate: the page does state 'No rebasing - your token count stays stable' and 'Interest is realized upon redemption/unstaking.' This confirms the general no-rebasing/fixe | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the source confirms that there is no rebasing, token count stays stable, and interest is realized upon redemption/unstaking, it does not state that yield accrues via 'NAV/exchange-rate accrual'

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=5, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports the core PRIME mechanism: PRIME deposits are supplied to the HELOC+ lending pool; the rate is the pool’s continuously/block-by-block utilization-based rate less a 0.50 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The only source whose live content was actually re-fetched is help.hastra.io, and it fully confirms the primary claim: PRIME's yield derives from staked wYLDS capital deployed into the Democratized Pr | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the fetched source from Hastra confirms that PRIME yield is generated by deploying staked wYLDS into the Democratized Prime HELOC+ lending pool and that Hastra deducts a 0.50% annual platform fe | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports the core current-rate mechanics: PRIME capital is supplied to the Democratized Prime HELOC+ lending pool; PRIME earns the pool’s continuously/block-by-block utilizatio

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=6, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — Neither re-fetched source supports the asserted issuer identity or corporate relationships. The SEC filing extract provided contains XBRL metadata/facts only and does not contain “Signum Ltd.,” “Hastr | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Neither cited source, as actually fetched, supports the specific claim. The SEC 10-Q filing content retrieved is just raw XBRL tagging metadata (context references, unit definitions, member tags) with | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched content from the SEC 10-Q filing excerpt does not mention 'Signum Ltd.', 'Hastra', or 'Provenance Cayman Foundation'. Additionally, the re-fetched text from https://hastra.io/terms is c

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports only that PRIME yield comes from “Demo Prime (DP)” lending operations using HELOC products and is “backed by actual home equity lines of credit.” It does not identify | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The Hastra help-center page (successfully re-fetched) does corroborate that PRIME's yield comes from real-world HELOC lending via the 'Demo Prime'/'Democratized Prime pool' and that this is 'Real Asse | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched source mentions 'Democratized Prime pool' / 'Demo Prime (DP)' and real equity lines of credit (HELOCs) backing PRIME, but it does not mention Figure or Figure Lending. Additionally, con

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=6) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: contradicted — The cited audit quote directly identifies the Provenance Blockchain Foundation—not Signum Ltd.—as Hastra’s operator. That conflicts with the material assertion that Hastra is “operated by Signum Ltd.” | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: contradicted — The core factual claim about operational structure is internally inconsistent with the source material presented. The issuer claim states Hastra is 'incubated with the Provenance Blockchain Foundation | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched source content for hastra.io/sherlock-hastra-audit.pdf consists only of unparsed binary PDF streams and objects, containing no readable text to support the claim. No live text content w

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=4) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra help page supports only that PRIME has a Solana contract address and states: “Yes, PRIME is fully transferable.” It does not establish that wYLDS is freely transferable, that either | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The permissionless/freely transferable characterization is supported by the Hastra help doc ('PRIME is fully transferable'), and the freeze authority existence is confirmed by the RugCheck report ('Fr | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched source confirms that PRIME is 'fully transferable', but it does not substantiate that there is no on-chain KYC gate, that freeze authority is controlled by up to ~5 admins, or the speci

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched page states that unstaked wYLDS yield is paid as additional wYLDS and that PRIME redemption yields additional wYLDS. It does not state that there is no fee, no passthrough fee, no claim fe | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The cited quote merely describes the mechanism by which wYLDS yield is distributed ('paid out as additional wYLDS'); it says nothing about whether any fee is deducted from that pass-through yield. The | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The cited source explains how yield is accrued and claimed for wYLDS and PRIME, but it contains no mention of any passthrough fees or that fee_wylds_passthrough equals 0. Assuming an undisclosed fee i

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only live re-fetched source provided, Hastra’s Terms page, contains no substantive text supporting any part of the narrative. No fetched source establishes a Squads v4 multisig, its control over u | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Only one of the three cited sources (hastra.io/terms) was actually re-fetched, and that fetch returned no substantive markdown content at all (just a title, no body text) — the claimed quote 'we may b | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched content from https://hastra.io/terms is empty, and no live content was returned for the README repository URL. As a result, none of the specific claims regarding Squads v4 multisig cont

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=6) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched YLDS homepage supports only the narrow point that Figure Certificate Company (FCC) issues YLDS: it describes YLDS as certificates issued through FCC and identifies FCC as the issuer in its | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Of the four cited quotes, live content was only actually re-fetched and legible for two sources. The ylds.com fetch does support that Figure Certificate Company is the FCC/YLDS issuer and that 'Figure | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the fetched sources confirm that Figure Certificate Company (FCC) is the issuer of YLDS and that Informal Systems conducted a security audit on Hastra Solana programs, many of the listed service

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The sources support that YLDS/Figure Transferable Certificates are interest-bearing debt securities and that accrued interest is paid monthly, automatically reinvested in additional Certificates unles | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The ylds.com quote about interest paid in kind or electively in USD is verbatim confirmed by the fetched FAQ text. However, the second quote 'debt instruments' is not verbatim in the fetched prospectu

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The re-fetched PDF content is not text-extractable in the provided material and does not visibly identify Sherlock, Hastra, an audit engagement, or a March–April 2026 audit period. The quoted sentence | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched content from the cited PDF URL is raw, undecoded PDF binary/stream data (compressed image and form XObject data) rather than extracted, human-readable text. None of the claimed quote te | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided source is a PDF file containing compressed binary streams and image objects without parseable text. Consequently, the re-fetched content does not verify the claimed quote or the assertion

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched PDF payload is not text-extracted in a way that exposes the claimed quotations or the substantive audit-report content. Its metadata/title identifies it as a “Figure Q4 2025: Hastra vault- | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched PDF content consists almost entirely of raw PDF object definitions, embedded images, and FlateDecode-compressed binary streams. The only human-readable text is the document metadata tit

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched SOL guide supports that PRIME→wYLDS redemption is atomic, has no unbonding period or queue, and may fail if the Chainlink price is stale or uninitialized. It does not expressly state that | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched help.hastra.io page does confirm that PRIME→wYLDS redemption is atomic and uncapped at the smart-contract layer (no unbonding period, redeem burns PRIME and transfers wYLDS immediately)

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only re-fetched source is Hastra’s wYLDS explainer. It says Hastra holds YLDS in reserve and purchases YLDS from Figure Markets, but it does not identify UMB Bank N.A., Flagstar Bank N.A., BitGo B | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The only live-fetched content provided is from help.hastra.io, which describes wYLDS/YLDS mechanics (reserve backing, purchase flow, yield distribution) but makes zero mention of custodians — no refer | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched source does not list or mention UMB Bank N.A., Flagstar Bank N.A., BitGo Bank & Trust N.A., or Copper as custodians.

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched YLDS site supports that KYC’ed YLDS holders can redeem for fiat through Figure Markets’ website or mobile app, and describes the redemption step as “As fast as same day.” It also states th | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The cited ylds.com page does confirm two elements of the claim: (1) YLDS certificates can be redeemed directly through Figure Markets (FAQ: 'KYC'ed holders of YLDS can redeem for fiat through figurema | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The cited page confirms that KYC'ed YLDS holders can redeem YLDS certificates for fiat via figuremarkets.com or the Figure Markets app at face value ($0.01 per certificate / $1.00 per 100 certificates

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only re-fetched source, https://hastra.io/terms, contains no substantive terms text and does not support any of the narrative’s issuer, jurisdiction, operational-failure, access-blocking, or PRIME | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The only source actually re-fetched (https://hastra.io/terms) returned no substantive markdown content beyond a page title ('Hastra-Fi | Pushing Forward the Future of Finance') — the page appears to b

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched material includes a PDF titled “Figure Q4 2025: Hastra vault-mint & vault-stake Solana programs summary audit report” and links to relevant GitHub repositories, but the supplied fetch does | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The only source actually fetched is the PDF at hastra.io, and it was retrieved as raw, undecoded PDF binary/compressed stream data (FlateDecode object streams), not as readable text. The only human-re | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The cited URL https://docs.hastra.io/architecture/smart-contracts was not retrieved in the live content. Furthermore, the PDF source content provided is compressed (FlateDecode) binary data, leaving t

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra page supports that wYLDS is backed 1:1 by YLDS held in Hastra’s reserve and that Hastra purchases YLDS from Figure Markets. The YLDS page supports that Figure Equity Solutions, Inc. is an S | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Two of the four cited sources (help.hastra.io and ylds.com) were actually re-fetched and do support certain elements: the 1:1 wYLDS/YLDS backing mechanism, Hastra's lack of a named third-party custodi | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra documentation supports that wYLDS is backed 1:1 by YLDS held in Hastra’s reserve and that PRIME is a staking-related product for wYLDS. The YLDS site supports that Figure Equity Sol

Verifier note panel 1/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The YLDS homepage supports that FCC reports YLDS reserves quarterly in financial statements included in public periodic SEC reports, and it states “Annual audit: Big Four Audited.” It also says YLDS i | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: confirmed — The re-fetched ylds.com content directly supports the core assertions: the FAQ states reserves are 'reported on a quarterly basis in the financial statements in our public periodic reports filed with

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched guide supports that returning to USDC is “a multi-step process” and begins to describe Phase 2 as an “admin-mediated two-step” vault-mint process. However, the displayed source truncates b | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched page confirms the general framing that 'Returning to USDC is a multi-step process' (exact match) and that Phase 2 wYLDS→USDC is described as an 'admin-mediated two-step request_red[eem]

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched guide describes the PRIME→wYLDS redemption and begins describing the wYLDS→USDC process, but the provided live content does not state any redemption minimum, including $2,000. The claimed | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The claimed quote '$2k' does not appear anywhere in the live re-fetched content from the cited URL. The fetched page content covers the mint, stake, and redemption lifecycle explanations but cuts off | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The cited document does not mention a minimum redemption amount of 2000 or $2k anywhere in the text.

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The re-fetched URL returns raw PDF object/image data only; it does not expose readable report text, title, auditor attribution, protocol name, audit scope, or March–April 2026 dates. The supplied exce | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The fetched content from the cited URL is raw, uninterpretable PDF binary/stream data (object definitions, FlateDecode compressed streams, image XObjects). No actual extractable text matching the clai | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched PDF stream from https://hastra.io/sherlock-hastra-audit.pdf contains only raw PDF structure and image data without extractable text supporting the claimed quote.

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra Terms expressly support the liquidity-risk portion: no guaranteed liquid secondary market, inability to sell or exchange PRIME at a desired price or at all, and possible deviation of PRIME | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The Hastra Terms of Use excerpt is well supported by the live fetch: it verbatim confirms 'There is no guarantee that a liquid secondary market will exist for PRIME' and 'You may be unable to sell or | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — Hastra’s Terms directly support the liquidity-risk portion: they state that PRIME’s market value may deviate from underlying NAV, that no liquid secondary market is guaranteed, and that holders may be

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched PRIME help page supports that users stake wYLDS to receive PRIME, that yield is realized on redemption/unstaking, and states users can “unstake [their] funds at any given time.” However, t | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The help.hastra.io/prime page is confirmed to contain the language 'you're able to unstake your funds at any given time,' supporting the 'anytime' side of the disputed claim. However, the re-fetched h | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The fetched source supports unstaking PRIME to receive wYLDS plus accrued yield at any given time, but does not mention that redemption occurs at an 'oracle-priced exchange rate'. Additionally, the te

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only live re-fetched source content provided for https://hastra.io/terms is blank, and no re-fetched content is provided for the docs.hastra.io URL. Therefore, the cited eligibility, KYC, non-U.S. | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The live re-fetch of https://hastra.io/terms returned no actual markdown content (empty body) on both attempts, and https://docs.hastra.io/legal/terms-of-service was not fetched at all in the provided | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched content from the cited source (https://hastra.io/terms) is completely empty, and https://docs.hastra.io/legal/terms-of-service was not successfully fetched. Therefore, there is no text

Verifier note panel 1/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: confirmed — The fetched SEC filing is Figure Certificate Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026. Its embedded filing data expressly identifies the relevant reserve instruments as “Goldm | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched content only shows the XBRL context tags and the table of contents/cover page of the 10-Q; the actual Note 3 Fair Value of Financial Instruments table (pages 11-13) where the reserve po | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched source text for the FCC Form 10-Q does not contain the claimed quote 'Total ... $600,824' nor does it explicitly mention 'YLDS'. Although the XBRL metadata lists Goldman Sachs Financial

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched PRIME page supports that PRIME’s yield comes from HELOC lending operations and provides real-estate-backed lending exposure. However, it does not support the more specific assertions that | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Only one of the two cited URLs was actually re-fetched (hastra.io/prime); the second citation (docs.hastra.io/architecture/underlying-assets), which is the source for the specific claim that 'YLDS is | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched PRIME page supports that PRIME’s yield comes from HELOC lending operations and provides exposure to real-estate-backed lending. However, it does not establish that the yield is generated s

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The only live fetched content supplied is for hastra.io/terms, and it contains no substantive terms or disclosures. No fetched source substantiates the quoted Hastra language, the asserted BVI/offshor | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The only live-fetched source provided is https://hastra.io/terms, and the re-fetch returned no substantive markdown content at all (just a page title, 'Hastra-Fi | Pushing Forward the Future of Financ

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports that PRIME yield is generated through Demo Prime’s HELOC lending operations and provides exposure to real-estate-backed lending. It also states PRIME is built on Figur | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The hastra.io/prime page (successfully re-fetched) does support the core claim that PRIME's yield derives from Demo Prime's HELOC lending operations and that the underlying stable asset is YLDS, issue | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra page supports that PRIME yield is generated through Demo Prime’s HELOC lending operations and provides exposure to real-estate-backed lending. However, it does not establish exclusivity—i.e

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The refetched terms page contains no substantive terms text, so it does not support the asserted KYC, U.S.-person, or OFAC/OFSI eligibility requirements. The fetched help article only states that PRIM | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The claim rests on three sources. First, hastra.io/terms was re-fetched and returned no substantive body text at all (only a title/nav shell) — the specific quoted language about KYC, non-U.S.-person | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched content from https://hastra.io/terms returned empty, and https://help.hastra.io/24d233935654815fb088ffef227d7f5a contains no information regarding KYC requirements, U.S. person restrict

Verifier note panel 1/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: confirmed — The SEC filing identifies itself as Figure Certificate Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2026. Its extracted filing content specifically identifies Goldman Sachs Financial S | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched content only contains the XBRL context definitions and the cover page/table of contents of the FCC 10-Q; it does not include the actual Note 3 (Fair Value of Financial Instruments) tabl | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched document from the provided URL does not contain the quoted text 'Total ... $600,824' or any mention of the amount $600,824.

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: contradicted — The Hastra documentation supports that PRIME is a yield-bearing receipt token representing a staked wYLDS position, and that wYLDS is a wrapped, yield-bearing receipt token backed by YLDS reserves. Ho | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: contradicted — The two quotes themselves are accurately lifted from the sources: help.hastra.io does describe PRIME as a 'Yield-bearing receipt token' (and wYLDS as a 'Yield bearing receipt token backed by reserves | google/gemini-3.6-flash: contradicted — The source documentation explicitly states that YLDS is backed by prime money market fund securities, contradicting the claim that it is backed by real-world HELOC private-credit assets.

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=4, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched Hastra page supports the PRIME mechanics: PRIME earns the HELOC+ utilization rate less a 0.50% annual Hastra platform fee; the pool rate is utilization-based and adjusts continuously, bloc | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The Hastra source (help.hastra.io) fully corroborates the PRIME-layer claims: PRIME's yield derives from the Democratized Prime HELOC+ pool's utilization-based rate, adjusted continuously block-by-blo | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The first part of the claim regarding PRIME's yield mechanism, continuous block-by-block pool utilization rate, real-estate borrower HELOC+ pool, and Hastra's 0.50% annual fee is confirmed by the Hast | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra page supports the utilization-based rate mechanics and the 0.50% annual fee: PRIME earns the Democratized Prime HELOC+ utilization rate less 0.50%, and the rate adjusts continuously, block

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=4) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The SEC prospectus supports that Figure Certificate Company (FCC) is the issuer and describes its relationship to Figure affiliates, but the supplied fetched excerpt does not establish PRIME’s public | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The SEC prospectus excerpt actually re-fetched does not include the sentence claiming Figure Certificate Company was organized in Delaware on April 13, 2023 — the fetched text cuts off before any 'Abo | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The re-fetched content provided in context consists solely of a snippet from an SEC filing (497 prospectus) for Figure Certificate Company and does not contain the complete text or the GlobeNewswire p

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The re-fetched integration guide describes minting, PRIME redemption, and the operator-mediated wYLDS-to-USDC redemption flow, but it does not state that minting or redemption fees are zero. Silence a | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched integration guide never states that mint or redeem fees are zero. It describes deposit/mint, staking, and a two-phase (request_redeem/complete_redeem) redemption flow, mentioning a $2k

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=3, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The sources support only parts of the narrative. YLDS.com expressly says YLDS are unsecured face-amount certificates solely backed by FCC’s assets and are not FDIC insured; it warns FCC may lack resou | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The two re-fetched pages (ylds.com and hastra.io/terms) support several core points: YLDS certificates are described on ylds.com as "unsecured face-amount certificates and solely backed by the assets | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The live re-fetched sources do not include the text of the GlobeNewswire press release cited in the claim, making the statement that Figure Technology Solutions publicly disclaimed responsibility for | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The FCC-backing portion is confirmed: YLDS.com expressly states that YLDS are unsecured face-amount certificates “solely backed by the assets of” FCC. Hastra’s terms also confirm that Hastra does not

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched material does not substantiate the complete custody roster or the asserted custody arrangements. Hastra’s documentation states only that wYLDS is backed 1:1 by YLDS “held in Hastra’s reser | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The claim bundles several custodial relationships, but the re-fetched sources only partially support them. (1) Hastra: the live page confirms YLDS is 'held in Hastra's reserve' and purchased from Figu | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The live re-fetched content does not contain information supporting BitGo Bank & Trust N.A., Copper, or Figure Equity Solutions, Inc. Furthermore, while Hastra mentions its YLDS reserve/vault, the sou

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched page states that unstaked wYLDS yield is paid as additional wYLDS, but it does not disclose any fee, state that fees are zero, or otherwise substantiate `fee_wylds = 0`. | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The cited page explains how wYLDS yield accrues and is claimed monthly, and how PRIME differs, but it never mentions any fee (or absence of fee) associated with holding or claiming wYLDS. The quote 'Y | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided source text explains how wYLDS and PRIME accrue and payout yield, but it contains no mention of fees or a zero-fee structure for wYLDS. Per the verdict guidelines, assuming an undisclosed

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched help page supports that users are told they can “unstake … at any given time” and that interest is realized on redemption/unstaking. The Terms expressly qualify this with the possibility t | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The help.hastra.io page confirms unstaking can happen 'at any given time' and that 'Interest is realized upon redemption/unstaking,' and the ToS page confirms the lock-up/delay warning language verbat | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The claim specifies that unstaking/redemption occurs at a 'Chainlink-oracle-priced exchange rate'. While the fetched sources mention that users can unstake PRIME for wYLDS anytime in the product help

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra page supports that PRIME yield is tied to Figure/Democratized Prime HELOC lending operations, is accrued based on real lending performance, and includes a Democratized Prime pool rate plus | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Only the hastra.io/prime page was actually re-fetched and returned live content; the Figure.com blog post that is cited as the source for the specific claim that 'the borrower is obligated to remove c

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The terms support that U.S. residents, citizens, and persons located in the United States or U.S. territories are ineligible; they restrict persons in comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions and expr | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: contradicted — The actual re-fetched hastra.io/terms content does confirm several elements: users must not be US residents/citizens (non-US persons requirement), Hastra reserves sole discretion to determine eligibil | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the sources confirm that users must be non-US persons, cannot be residents/citizens of sanctioned jurisdictions (including Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, and Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk), and that H

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The refetched SEC content is predominantly XBRL metadata and does not contain the quoted text “Signum Ltd. (dba Hastra)” or any readable disclosure establishing that Signum is the Hastra protocol oper | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched content from the cited SEC URL consists entirely of raw XBRL context/tag metadata (dei: and us-gaap: taxonomy elements, dates, member tags) from the document's header/instance data. It | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided text snippet from Figure Technology Solutions Form 10-Q for Q1 2026 does not contain the quoted text 'Signum Ltd. (dba Hastra)' nor any mention of Signum Ltd., Hastra protocol, or YLDS ho

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The sources support that YLDS holders must complete KYC onboarding and that KYC’ed YLDS holders may redeem through Figure Markets. They also support that Hastra imposes jurisdiction/sanctions-related | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The YLDS portion of the claim is well supported: the ylds.com FAQ explicitly states 'All holders must successfully onboard and complete KYC' and that 'KYC'ed holders of YLDS can redeem for fiat,' conf | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The cited sources do not support the claim that completing KYC identity verification and OFAC/OFSI screening is a required onboarding prerequisite before accessing Hastra's site or protocol. Hastra's

Verifier note panel 0/2 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The cited Form 497 prospectuses do support that Figure Certificate Company (FCC)—not expressly “YLDS”—is a face-amount certificate company registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The first quoted fragment is fully supported: the April 2026 form497.htm explicitly states FCC 'is a face-amount certificate company registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=5, disputed) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra page supports that PRIME is obtained by depositing/staking wYLDS and may be unstaked at any time; it also confirms transferability. It does not state that the holder has an on-chain legal r | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The two cited sources verbatim match the quoted text (PRIME transferability language and YLDS 'unsecured face-amount certificate... backed by assets of FCC' disclosure), so the quotes themselves are a | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided sources do not explicitly state that there is an 'on-chain redemption right to wYLDS from Hastra's vault only', that it is 'not a fund share', or that 'whether this extends to an enforcea

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=2) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The Hastra page supports that PRIME staking uses wYLDS, that wYLDS is backed by YLDS reserves, and that PRIME yield comes from Figure/Democratized Prime HELOC lending operations. The cited Figure disc | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — Only hastra.io/prime was actually re-fetched and its content supports the general claims that PRIME's yield derives solely from Figure's Democratized Prime HELOC lending pool, that the base collateral | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: contradicted — Hastra supports that PRIME has HELOC exposure and that its yield is generated through Figure’s Democratized Prime HELOC lending operations. However, it does not support the absolute characterization t

Verifier note panel 0/4 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — Hastra’s Terms support that Signum Ltd./Hastra is organized in the BVI; that users receive wYLDS in exchange for USDC; that wYLDS is collateralized 1:1 by YLDS; that PRIME is a liquid-staking token as | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched Hastra Terms of Use page does confirm several material elements: Hastra (Signum Ltd.) is organized under BVI law, the Terms exclude U.S. persons/residents and residents of a list of com | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — While the provided Hastra Terms confirm that Signum Ltd. is a BVI entity, that U.S. persons and sanctioned jurisdictions are excluded, and that YLDS is SEC-registered, the fetched source text does not | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — Hastra’s Terms explicitly exclude U.S. residents, citizens, and persons located in the United States or U.S. territories, and also exclude persons in listed comprehensively sanctioned/otherwise unlawf

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=3) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched page confirms it is Hastra’s “Terms of Use,” last updated December 3, 2025, and supports that it sets eligibility restrictions relevant to wYLDS/PRIME, permits Hastra to request informatio | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The eligibility quote ('must not be a resident, citizen, or person located in the United States of America or any U.S. territory') matches verbatim in the re-fetched Terms of Use, and the 'Last update | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The fetched source text ends mid-sentence in Section 5 (Disclaimers) and does not contain any clause or quote establishing a $100 liability cap ('HASTRA'S TOTAL LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTI

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched filing identifies “UMB Bank N.A. | Repurchase Agreements” at March 31, 2026 and the claimed quoted amount of 389,556 (presumably $389.556 million if the relevant table is in thousands). Ho | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched page content only shows the XBRL context/header block and the table of contents for the 10-Q; it does not include the actual Note 3 (Fair Value of Financial Instruments) table text wher | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided source snippet does not contain the claimed percentage (64.84%), total reserve portfolio amount (~$600.8M), token ticker (YLDS), or the value of 389,556 cited in the claimed quotes.

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=6) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched documentation supports that PRIME is non-rebasing (token count stays stable), that its value/redemption value increases over time, and that its yield is realized upon unstaking rather than | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The two fetched pages support most of the claim: PRIME is described as non-rebasing ('No rebasing - your token count stays stable'), yield is realized on unstake rather than monthly ('PRIME yield is r | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided sources confirm that PRIME is non-rebasing, that its redemption value in terms of wYLDS increases over time, that yield is realized upon unstaking, and that raw wYLDS pays a monthly claim

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched filing identifies eight holdings labeled “United States Treasury Bill” as of March 31, 2026, which supports that FCC held Treasury bills at that date. However, the supplied source content | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The re-fetched page content only shows the XBRL context/tag metadata (e.g., 'United States Treasury Bill 1' through 'United States Treasury Bill 8', 'UMB Bank N.A. | Repurchase Agreements', 'Goldman S | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The provided SEC Form 10-Q filing excerpt for Figure Certificate Company (FCC) does not contain details confirming that U.S. Treasury bills constituted 34.77% of FCC's reserve portfolio backing YLDS,

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=4) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched page supports that users deposit/stake wYLDS to receive PRIME and that PRIME operates primarily on Solana. It does not identify the vault’s on-chain holdings, state that staked wYLDS is PR | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The cited page only describes the mechanics of staking wYLDS to receive PRIME (deposit wYLDS, get PRIME, unstake anytime) and lists PRIME's use cases, yield source, and risks. It never states or impli | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The source text mentions depositing wYLDS to receive PRIME, but it does not state or confirm that wYLDS is PRIME's sole direct on-chain collateral, nor does it state that wYLDS represents effectively

Verifier note panel 0/3 confirmed (agreement=1) | openai/gpt-5.6-terra: unsupported — The fetched 10-Q supports that Figure Certificate Company reported an investment labeled “Goldman Sachs Financial Square” with a reported amount of 2,362 (apparently presented in thousands) at March 3 | anthropic/claude-sonnet-5: unsupported — The fetched page content is only the XBRL header/context definitions and the table of contents for the 10-Q; it does not include the actual Note 3 Fair Value table (page 11) where the Goldman Sachs Fi | google/gemini-3.6-flash: unsupported — The cited filing text contains a reference to 'Goldman Sachs Financial Square' in its XBRL tags, but it does not contain the claimed value/percentage of 0.39% (or the quoted figure '2,362'), nor does